Building Blocks of Emunah – Parshas Va’eira 5770
We have been introduced the our great leader Moshe Rabbeinu. The Torah accounts for small select parts of his upbringing. We are told about his birth, we are also told about how he left Egypt. Then we are told the first encounter that Moshe has with Hashem Yisborach, with the burning bush. There is so much to discuss on all of that but one thing specifically that seems to be so essential to Moshe seems to be left out of the Written Torah. We see that a constant response of Moshe Rabbeinu is that he is “כבד פה” he also says that he is “ערל שפתים” among other similar phrases. I must remind myself that Moshe Rabbeinu was well beyond anything that I could possibly comprehend. We see that Hashem comes to Moshe telling him all that he must do and yet Moshe can still insist that he is not qualified. You can say, wow such an unuv, such a modest individual. At the same time you can say, how can you possibly suggest that you cannot do that which Hashem has asked of you!? Is there a nisayon that we cannot withstand? No. There must be something more to the constant insisting of Moshe Rabbeinu than meets the eye. I cannot dare say that he was challenging Hashem, as that is silly.
Every year after having gone through Parshas Shemos I am always left a little confused, feeling as though I have missed something, and indeed I have. At the end of shishi it is written:
ויאמר ה’ אל משה בלכתך לשוב מצרימה ראה כל המפתים אשר שמתי בידך ועשיתם לפני פרעה ואני אחזק את לבו ולא ישלח את העם: ואמרת אל פרעה כה אמר ה’ בני בכרי ישראל: ואמר אליך שלח את בני ויעבדני ותמאו לשלחו הנה אנכי הרג את בנך בכרך: (שמות ד, כא-כג)
We see that Hashem says that after all the incredible things that Paroh will see, he will still not send the nation of Yisroel to exile. We see that Hashem will strengthen his heart. What does that mean? It is written after everyone of the makos that Hashem strengthened the heart of Paroh causing him not to sending Bnei Yisroel out. Why is that so?
I would like to suggest that it was essential for Klal Yisroel then and now that there be the Asuruh Makos. Since we see that Hashem had to strengthen the heart of Paroh perhaps that means that even after the first of the makos he would have given in, but that I am unsure of. It is clear that the last of the makos, Makos B’churim is the final step. Whatever the reason for the makos it seems that it would be completed by that point. It may have also been that the Egyptians needed a certain amount of kapuruh for their actions, but I don’t think that is the main reason.
It seems to me that the main reason for the makos was that Klal Yisroel needed them to strengthen their emunah, in order to be Bnei Yisroel. Through the makos and the actual Yitzias Mitzrayim, Klal Yisroel grew in their emunah and became capable of saying Na’aseh V’Nishmah as Kabalas HaTorah. Without having gone through all of this it would not have been possible!
Today we keep the Torah and Mitzvos, without having seen these nisim. How is it that we do so? How is that there are things that are done in the midbar that seem to be below us, but are clearly not! Perhaps the reason is that we have inherited the emunah of our avos. Through the experiences that Klal Yisroel went through they grew. Today we have thousands of years of nisyonos deep within our heritage. It was Moshe Rabbeinu and the Dor Dayuh who had to go through all of that for us. We would never have been able to stand up to the challenges that they faced, not a chance.
It is with this thought that we can begin to understand this weeks parshah. The beginning of the makos that befell Egypt in awe and wonder. These are the abc’s of emunah and bitachon for the Jewish People. It is my brachah that we all take these words of Torah into our hearts and strengthen them. Just as Hashem strengthens the heart of Paroh so to these events can strengthen our hearts to bring us closer to Hashem. May we all grow closer to walking in the ways of Hashem and constantly embrace all the amazing gifts that lay before us.



(2 votes, average: 4.50 out of 5)
