The Remains of Yosef – Parshas Beshalach 5769
Following the lengthy wait Klal Yisroel are finally sent to leave Mitzrayim. After noting the unusual path that they were heading the Torah acknowledges the deed of Moshe Rabbeinu. Says the pasuk“ויקח משה את עצמות יוסף”, “And Moshe took the remains of Yosef”. The choice of the word va’yikach (coming from the word קיחה, to take) had always seemed unusual. Not only does the word va’yikach bother me but the fact that the pasuk uses the word והעליתם at the end of the pasuk in reference to the promise that was made. Additionally we need to explain why Moshe is pointed out as the one to “take” the remains. The pasuk could have written that the remains were taken, or nothing at all. It is no coincidence that Moshe is the one mentioned and that this pasuk is in fact something that must be mentioned. You may suggest that the Torah is coming to show that Klal Yisroel kept their promise. The idea of establishing a relationship through a promise and later showing its completion is the ultimate adherence to one’s word. The Midrash Tanchuma says that Moshe went to find Yosef however the Midrash asks how did Moshe know which aron was his. Says Moshe Yosef Yosef it is time that the Holy One Blessed Be He is to redeem his people….If you reveal yourself – good, if not I am clean of my promise. Immediately the aron shook and Moshe took Yosef and went on his way. That is a loose translation of the Tanchuma which clearly states that Moshe was concerned about keeping the promise, and they he put in the necessary effort. To add to this idea the Midrash Rabahsays a beautiful idea that exemplifying the act of Moshe. Yosef had buried his father because he was obligated as his son, Moshe was not from the tribe of Yosef (he was from Levi), says HaKadosh Baruch Hu, just like you (Moshe) were not obligated to bury Yosef, I will reciprocate and bury you even though I am not obligated to do so. This act of Moshe earned him burial by Hashem. What was so great about this action? The Midrash bring the pasuk in Mishleiחכם לב יקח מצות as all of Yisroel were involved in silver and gold Moshe was involved in the remains of Yosef. The question as I had already mentioned is also asked by the Yidai Moshe on Midrash Rabah, he asks why doesn’t the pasuk say ויעל as the and of the pasuk uses that language. He answers by saying that Moshe took the remains in place of taking the gold and silver that they had taken from the Egyptians. This answer is greatly emphasizes the actions of Klal Yisroel although it is hard to say that the pasuk is pointing out such a contrast when the Torah is not talking about their actions. We see twice in the previous parshah reference to the money. The first time is the commandment to do so and the second is in its execution. There seems to be no emphasis on a great involvement in this. The truth is that even if there was it still doesn’t explain what was going on at the time of this parshah. I’m left with a question that I feel is greater than its answer, and I prefer to keep it that way.
The greatness of Moshe’s actions is clearly pristine. The words of Chazal explain that Moshe was zocheh to burial by Hashem himself due to his actions. As was already mentioned there must be a greater significance beyond the fact that Moshe did something that no one else was willing to do…isn’t that what Moshe was all about? The Chazal quote a pasuk in Mishlei that expounds upon the grandeur of his actions, חכם לב יקח מצות. On that pasuk the Baal HaTurim comments that the gematriah of Mitzvos is 612 (if you spell out each letter as he explains), which is the same as the words תלמידי חכמים. It is without question that there is a connection with the word Mitzvos and the 613 Mitzvos in the Torah. It is also interesting to know that the gematriah העצמות is Torah. Additionaly the word atzmos contains the mitzvos. In fact perhaps it is that the עין or eye of the Torah is Mitzvos. That means that the 70 interpretations of Torah as well as its sense of sight is associated with it intrinsic value. The word atzmos means both bone and core or essence. That means that the Talmidei Chachamim and the Mitzvosand the eye of the Will of Hashem is the essence (העצמות).
A simple explanation of the connection with the pasuk in Mishlei is that the Chacham is the greatest physical embodiment of the Will of Hashem. He dedicates his life to seeking the truth and carrying it out. His lev is the force that drives you. The blood that runs through your body is the life force that enables your body to function. The heart pumps the blood throughout the body to that which needs it. The heart pumps constantly beat after beat without any other intention. The lev is the source of the carrying out of Hashem’s will. It is the mind that contains the consciousness and the greatest essence of what defines you to be a man, but it is the heart that carries on the duties with such consistency. This idea is clearly personified by the fact that the Torah is in fact lev as it begins with a beis and ends with a lamed, this is the source of every heart. The will to live, to carry out the Will of Hashem is imprinted in the genetic code of our heart. It is the Chacham who not only functions in his flesh but in his will as well. It is the one who thirsts for the opportunity to enhance his relationship with his Maker that will gladly leap to the endless offers at hand. The feeling of satisfaction never quenches the yearning for more.
There are two more pieces to the puzzle before us that are still unclear. The greatness of the remains of Yosef in reference to the exile from Egypt, and why it is followed by the description of the Annunai HaKavod that guided Klal Yisroel. Pirkei D’Rebbi Eliezer says that when Moshe attempted to place his hands on the water and nothing happened. He then looked at his bris milah and at the aron of Yosef and at his staff that had engraved in it the explicit name of Hashem and it didn’t accept. Answered Moshe to Hashem, the water won’t listen to me. Immediately the revealed Hashem in his honor on the water and chased the water. Explains the Radal on this that it is clear from Mechiltah that it is the merit of the remains of Yosef that the water was split, as is hinted by the language that he tilted his hand, what was in his hand the remains of Yosef were in his hand. Now we see that the zchus of Yosef and the Mitzvah of taking his remains is what allowed the splitting of the sea. If that alone is the reason why is it that Moshe had to say to Hashem that the water would not listen to him? Only then Hashem came and the water broke apart. The Mechiltah brings out this point even clearer through a mashal. A king has two gardens one inside of the other. A gentleman comes and purchases the inner garden from the King. The new owner approaches the outer garden attempting to enter into his newly acquired property with little success. The King’s guard is resisting and refuses to let the owner in. The owner explains his situation and that the King said so. This loyal guard is not willing to just hand over to anyone who claims the right to the garden. The owner shows the guard the King’s seal which had obviously been given from the King. The guard continues to refuse to allow the owner to enter. Finally the owner asked the King himself to come and speak to the guard, with promising results. The owner questions the guard as to why he resisted when he had requested in the name of the King. The guard responds it is not because of you that I am leaving it is because of the King. This Mechiltah is a startling one and surely needs explanation. The Mechiltah ends by citing the pasuk הים ראה וינס, it is not before you that I ran but מלפני אדון חולי ארץ מלפני אלוה יעקב ההופכי הצור אגם מים חלמיש למעינו מים. Just as we are servants of Hashem so too are the bodies of land and water that fill this world. Everything that exists functions under the rule of the King of Kings. Although our role in this world is dominant over other creations we are still only servants of Hashem. We do not control this world we may present the Will of Hashem thus utilizing our role to continue to carry out the Will of Hashem through his Name. The power of a servant is only is as great as his Master wills, no matter how great a servant he is not the King. It is when you are executing the request of the King where you have done everything in your capacity but fall short. Within that capacity you are given the priviledge to call upon the King to finish that which you had started. It is embedded within the will of the King that your abilities include the chance to request the presence of the King. The fact that the aron of Yosef is in the hand of Moshe as he stands before the yam, shows that his action of taking the remains of Yosef as well as Yosef himself are the extent to which Moshe was able to split the yam. Without that action Moshe would have been lacking in his pursuit to follow the orders of the King and it would be a disgrace to request the King for such a reason.
The fact that this noble act of Moshe is found next to the description of the Anunai HaKavod still needs explanation. Within the approach we had in regards to the splitting of the sea we can begin to understand this as well. The Chazal say a very perplexing the statement about the aron of Yosef. I first want to note that the pasukdoes not actually say that the remains of Yosef were in an aron rather the Targum Yonasan Ben Aziyaldoes translate it that way. Why is it so important that the remains of Yosef be kept in an aron? The Chazal tell us a conversation between the nations of the world and Klal Yisroel. Says the Mechiltahthat with Yosef came the aron, the shechinah, the Kohanim, the Leviim, Yisroel, the seven Anunai HaKavod and no more!? Rather the aronof Yosef went with the aron chai HaOlamim. Says the nations of the world to Yisroel: what is the greatness of the two arons? Yisroel responded to them this is the aron chai HaOlamim and this is the aron shel mais. It seems to me that the aron chai HaOlamim is the aron that held the luchos. The problem is that the luchos were not given yet and there is no aron. The truth is that the idea is still true it is simply referring to a conversation that took place in a later time. Assuming that is true why should that be the answer to the question of the nature of the arons. Furthermore isn’t it odd that we usually don’t usually consider a tzaddik to have a title of mais, of course he is no longer living in this world. The answer is that the Torah is the key to an immortal life, the remains of a person is not. The teachings that we have and the actions that they did still affect us today. The fact that there remains are here is not what is so great about them. Good so maybe we can say that is the explanation to the midrash but what does that have to do with why this whole idea is found next to the Anunai HaKavod. It is possible that the answer is when you do all that are capable of in the end you must realize that you are being led by Hashem. Yosef was dealt a life full of struggles and he stood up to all of them. Yosef is the one who overcame his Yetzer HaRato illicit relations, and to become an Egyptian, to question the winding path that he took through out his life. Yosef accepted all that he was given and was the B’chor Shor. The idea of the Anunai HaKavodis the constant presence of the will of Hashem, no questions. May we all be zocheh to follow the great paths that lay before us and swiftly bring in Mashiach Tzidkainu.